One of the latest Marks & Spencer commercials was banned by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) due to complaints about a model who was depicted as being “unhealthily thin.” The ASA continued to have doubts that the advertisement failed to comply with responsible advertising guidelines and encouraged potentially unhealthy body ideals. The ruling sparked considerable debate regarding media ethics, body image, and the fashion industry’s role.
M&S Autumn Campaign
Earlier this year, Marks & Spencer launched its Autumn womenswear advertisement, which featured images of models wearing the company’s latest seasonal range. Viewers roundly condemned one of the model photos as portraying an anorexic appearance and warned that the advertisement could negatively impact young viewers and those susceptible to eating disorders.
The advertisers displayed the ad across online and print media, including social networking websites and online shopping platforms. Various formal complaints requesting its withdrawal were made to the ASA within a couple of days.
ASA Investigations
After reviewing complaints, the ASA conducted a detailed investigation, analysing how the advertisement presented the model, assessing her appearance, and evaluating the overall message the image conveyed. Regulators examined the model’s posture, styled her, assessed her body proportions, and evaluated the setting in which the picture was taken.
The ASA ruled in its decision that the ad indiscriminately depicted a body that was “unhealthily thin” and risked perpetuating negative stereotypes. The ASA asserted that the model’s sunken collarbones, absence of muscle tone, and concave face, particularly around her arms and cheeks, all contributed to giving the appearance of ill health.
The watchdog banned the image from resurfacing in its current form after concluding that it might cause viewers to feel dissatisfied with their bodies.
Marks & Spencer Response
In a prompt response to the decision, Marks & Spencer defended the campaign’s model and creative team. The business affirmed that the model was in good health and clarified that they neither staged the picture nor intended it to promote any particular ideal of body type.
M&S disagrees very strongly with the ASA’s ruling,” said an M&S spokesperson. The advertisement emphasised diversity in style and design, featuring a healthy adult model. M&S remains committed to responsible and inclusive advertising.
The company added that it had thoughtfully considered the matter and would review its visual requirements for future advertisements following the ruling.
ASA Action
Mental health and body image campaign supporters welcomed the ASA’s decision as a key move to counter the normalisation of extreme thinness in commercials. Advocacy groups have warned for years that, especially among adolescent girls and young women, depictions of beauty that are not real could drive the increase of eating disorders, anxiety, and body dysmorphia.
“Sensational imagery like this distorts perceptions of what healthy bodies are,” added Dr. Sarah McIntyre, a media influence and youth health psychologist who supports the ban. Companies are responsible for the social consequences of their advertisements. This action sends a very powerful message.
Fashion Industry
The controversy has reignited long-standing concerns that critics have voiced over the fashion industry’s reliance on extremely thin models and its failure to reflect the real-world diversity of body sizes, ages, and ethnicities. Despite recent efforts by numerous corporations to adopt body-positive marketing, critics argue that progress remains uneven.
James Carter, a retail analyst, pointed out that “Marks & Spencer built up a reputation as a brand for every body type.” This advert confused people regarding their ideals and contradicted that image. Branded adverts must respond to shifting social norms.
Reputational Hurdles
Marks & Spencer now finds itself in a precarious position due to the scandal, having to balance consumer expectations and regulatory scrutiny while protecting its brand reputation. For future advertisements, the incident could prompt M&S to reassess its in-house policies on image selection, styling, and casting.
“Customers want more out of heritage brands such as M&S,” said marketing expert Angela Reeves. Authentic representation is now a necessity rather than an option.
 due to complaints){kind=link}